Citizen's Quill

In a chilling echo of past rhetoric, Donald Trump’s repeated invocation of the “Insurrection Act” is far more than just rhetoric; it’s a direct threat to American democracy. This is a clear signal of his intent to deploy the military against citizens. With no genuine insurrection unfolding anywhere in the United States, his fixation on this rarely used law reveals a desperate strategy to pave the way for his authoritarian vision under Project 2025. Perhaps the most alarming direction this is headed is directly to the use of federalized military force to control the integrity and outcomes of future elections, particularly 2026.

The Insurrection Act: A Tool for Emergency, Not Executive Overreach

The Insurrection Act is a series of federal laws (10 U.S.C. §§ 251-255) that grants the President limited authority to deploy U.S. armed forces domestically in specific, extreme circumstances. These generally include suppressing an insurrection, rebellion, or domestic violence that hinders the enforcement of laws or deprives citizens of their constitutional rights, when state authorities are unable or unwilling to act (1). Let’s be very clear on that last part – this is only invoked if a state is not in control. It is designed as a last resort, a critical safeguard for national order, not a blank check for presidential power.

Historically, its use has been rare and highly scrutinized. Deploying the military on U.S. soil against citizens is a profound act, one that fundamentally alters the relationship between the government and its people, blurring the lines between military force and civilian law enforcement.

Manufacturing Crisis: Why “Insurrection Act” Now?

The critical point is this: there is currently no insurrection occurring in any part of the United States. Public protests, even large or contentious ones, do not constitute an insurrection, which implies widespread, organized armed resistance against government authority.

Trump’s continuous invocation of the Act, therefore, is not a response to reality but a strategic maneuver. It serves multiple dangerous purposes:

1. Manufacturing a Pretext for Power: By constantly talking about ‘insurrection,’ Trump is creating the illusion of an existential threat, which he can use to justify extreme executive actions. This narrative is essential for normalizing the idea of military intervention in domestic affairs.
2. Intimidation and Suppression: The very threat of military deployment can be used to intimidate political opponents, suppress dissent, and create a climate of fear among those who might peacefully protest government policies or go to a polling site to vote.
3. Laying the Groundwork for Project 2025: Project 2025, a detailed blueprint for a future Trump administration, explicitly outlines plans for an unprecedented expansion of presidential power, including giving the President greater control over federal agencies and the ability to sideline career civil servants (2). The Insurrection Act fits seamlessly into this vision, providing a legal (or pseudo-legal) justification for deploying force to overcome any perceived resistance to these radical changes.

The Ultimate Goal: Controlling Elections with Military Force

Perhaps the most alarming aspect of this rhetoric is its clear trajectory towards influencing and controlling elections. Trump has a documented history of seeking to overturn election results and undermining faith in democratic processes. His recent request for voter rolls from all states, while framed as an effort to ensure election integrity, can also be seen as an attempt to gather data for potential challenges or even to identify perceived “enemies” of his agenda.

The danger lies in the potential weaponization of the Insurrection Act to interfere with the 2026 midterm elections, and beyond. Imagine a scenario where:

• Suppression of Protests: Peaceful protests against election results or policies are labeled as “insurrections,” justifying military deployment to disperse them, intimidate voters, or even block access to polling places or ballot counting centers.
• Federalization of Elections: Military personnel, acting under presidential orders, could be used to “oversee” elections, potentially challenging voters, impounding ballots, or otherwise disrupting the established, civilian-run electoral process. This would represent an unprecedented federalization and militarization of elections, effectively ensuring outcomes favorable to his agenda.
• Ignoring State Authority: The Insurrection Act could be used to circumvent the authority of state governors and election officials, installing federal control over processes that are fundamentally state-run and overseen by civilians.

This is not a hypothetical fear; it aligns with Trump’s past actions and stated desires to exert absolute control. The deployment of federal agents in Chicago, using military-style tactics against civilians under the guise of “law enforcement,” provided a terrifying preview of what such executive overreach could look like.

A Direct Threat to Democracy

The repeated invocation of the Insurrection Act, without any legitimate basis, is a direct assault on the principles of civilian control over the military, federalism, and free and fair elections. It signals a willingness to weaponize the military as a political tool, transforming it from a protector of the nation into an enforcer of one man’s will.

This is a hallmark of authoritarianism: manufacturing crises to justify extraordinary powers, using state force to silence opposition, and ultimately, undermining the electoral process itself. We must be acutely aware of this dangerous rhetoric and its underlying intent. The defense of our democratic institutions requires vigilance against any attempt to use emergency powers for partisan gain and to turn the military against the very people it is sworn to protect.

Helpful Resources:

Project 2025 Tracker
Project 2025 Executive Action Tracker

References:

(1) 10 U.S. Code Chapter 13 – INSURRECTION. (n.d.). LII / Legal Information Institute. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/subtitle-A/part-I/chapter-13

(2) Chretien, Spencer. “Project 2025.” The Heritage Foundation, 31 Jan. 2023, www.heritage.org/conservatism/commentary/project-2025.

‌

---